You can see we are superior in strength, durability, distribution uniformity and reliability:

Nominal flow rate per outlet (l/h) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   1.13

Nominal pressure (bar)              . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    0.7

Wall thickness (mm)              . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    0.152

Spacing between two emission devices (cm)   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  . . .     30.5

Manufacturing variation

Number of outlets tested       . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        25

Test pressure (bar)           . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          0.7

Test temperature (°C)      . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           23

ec: variation between the nominal flow rate and the average flow rate (%)  2.43

Cv: manufacturing coefficient of variation

Cv value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  0.74

Results based on the Cemagref protocol   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Very good

Results based on the ISO protocol  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   A

Flow/pressure law

In the form of: q = kHx. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.380

Value of x  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  . . . . . . . .   . . . . . .   0.507

Results based on the Cemagref protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .  Tolerant

Pressure variation for a flow variation of 10% (mCE) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.38

Clogging . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125

Recommended filtration (micron) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Low sensitive